Enbridge fined $3.7 million for 2010 oil spill in US

 US agency says uncovered two dozen violations
Vancouver Sun/Reuters, July 2, 2012

Ruptured Enbridge pipeline in Michigan, July 2010.  More than 20,000 barrels of heavy crude was spilled, contaminating 38 miles (60 km) of the Kalamazoo River.

WASHINGTON, July 2 (Reuters) – The U.S. pipeline regulator on Monday slapped a $3.7 million fine, the largest penalty ever imposed, on Enbridge Inc for a July 2010 crude oil spill which contaminated stretches of the Kalamzoo River in Michigan. The Transportation Department’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) said its probe uncovered two dozen regulation violations related to the leak on Enbridge’s Line 6B near the town of Marshall, about mid-way between Detroit and Lake Michigan.
“We will hold pipeline operators accountable if they do not follow proper safety procedures to protect the environment and local communities,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement. Enbridge has 30 days to respond to the order. PHMSA’s order against Enbridge accuses the company of failing to adhere to regulations for maintaining pipeline integrity. The agency also said the company attempted to bring the pipeline back into service despite receiving multiple leak alarms the night it ruptured, leading to the release of more oil. Enbridge’s 30-inch line ultimately spilled more than 20,000 barrels of heavy crude and contaminated 38 miles (60 km) of the Kalamazoo River. The accident shut down the pipeline for more than two months and spawned a massive clean-up that the company has estimated will cost more than $700 million. Following the Enbridge spill and other major pipeline accidents, the Transportation Department enhanced its oversight last year. The department is collecting more data on pipelines and in 2011 closed 102 enforcement cases, its highest level for a single year. Last December, Congress passed a pipeline safety bill that raised maxiumum fines and authorized an increase in the number of pipeline inspectors. Enbridge said it was reviewing the PHMSA order. “We will not comment specifically on the contents of the (Notice of Probable Violation) until that analysis is complete,” the company said in a statement.

 

About these ads

Posted on July 2, 2012, in Oil & Gas and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 702 other followers

%d bloggers like this: