First Nations outraged by Clark’s Enbridge pipeline ‘sales pitch’

 By Tiffany Crawford, Vancouver Sun, July 28, 2012

Members of Yinka Dene Alliance protest Enbridge’s proposed Northern Gateway pipeline.

First Nations opposed to the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline project are accusing B.C. Premier Christy Clark of selling out British Columbians and putting a price tag on the future of aboriginal people.

The Yinka Dene Alliance, a group of five First Nations in the B.C. Interior, issued a statement Saturday, saying it rejects Clark’s “sales pitch.”

The B.C. government said earlier this week it won’t support the $6-billion Enbridge project until five environmental and fiscal conditions are met, including B.C. getting a much larger share of economic benefits such as resource royalties or other tax revenue.

On Friday, Clark refused to sign onto any national energy strategy until B.C.’s dispute with Alberta and the federal government over the Northern Gateway oil pipeline is resolved.

But Clark’s push for a greater share of the pipeline pie has outraged members of the alliance.

“It is absolutely unacceptable for our premier to play a game of ‘the Price is Right’ while putting our lands, our waters and our futures at risk to devastating oil spills,” said Terry Teegee, tribal chief of the Carrier Sekani Tribal Council.

“This is our lives, the well-being of our families that she is playing with. We won’t let her sell our lands out from under us.”

Chief Martin Louie of the Nadleh Whut’en First Nation said the government can’t “put a price tag on our future,” adding that the alliance is committed to fighting the project.

“Clark has admitted that B.C. will take 100 per cent of the risks from tankers and most of the pipeline risk. For her to turn around the next day and start bargaining for royalties – that’s knowingly trying to sell all British Columbians out,” said Louie.

The Enbridge project would carry oilsands crude, or bitumen, from northern Alberta to Kitimat, for shipment to Asia.

 

Posted on July 28, 2012, in Oil & Gas and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. The whole thing is a spin-doctor game. The contention between Clark and Alberta is a put-on. They want to make the denial of enbridge a heroic gesture from Clark, not the work of those who would stand up to enbridge. Yer all being played.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: