Protest targets Enbridge hearings in Kelowna

Public barred once again from community hearings

Some of the protesters in Kelowna on Jan 28, 2013.

Some of the protesters in Kelowna on Jan 28, 2013.

CBC News, Jan 28, 2013

About 200 people demonstrated outside the Northern Gateway Joint Review Panel Hearings today in Kelowna after the public was once again barred from the community hearings because of unspecified safety concerns.

“The panel has become aware of information regarding safety concerns if the hearing continues as originally planned. As a result, the panel is restricting the hearing room to oral statement presenters, their guest and the media,” said a statement issued by the panel.

But just like the hearings in Vancouver and Victoria, the public was permitted to watch the proceedings on a video feed in a hotel a few kilometers away.

Dylan North was one of dozens of protesters who came from all around the southern interior of B.C. with hopes of attending the hearings live.

“It doesn’t really surprise me that there is just one more piece of red tape that keeps me apart from what’s going on. I think that kind of the big idea is keeping the public as uninformed as possible to be honest.”

Ronald Pharand also travelled from Nelson to make his views known.

“We all, of course, have the same feeling about this pipeline that a lot of other people have in B.C. — it’s important to stop it.”

Inside the hearing, one speaker after told the panel about their concerns with the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline. Teacher Ursula Lussin urged the joint review panel to reject the proposal.

“For the first time in my life, I feel ashamed to be a Canadian. I am embarrassed that we are not stepping up to find solutions to the climate crisis and are instead planning to make it worse,” said Lussin.

The hearings move next to Prince Rupert, B.C., for ten sets of four-to-five-day hearings that will run from early February until early May. The panel’s recommendations on the Northern Gateway Project are expected by the end of the year.

If approved, the almost 1,200-kilometre-long twin pipeline would carry about 525,000 barrels of bitumen per day from Alberta to the B.C. coast for shipment by tankers to Asia and other markets around the world.

Posted on January 28, 2013, in Oil & Gas and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. Enbridge has told everyone that Northern Gateway project will cost $6.5B while it has known for months that the cost as proposed currently is above $22B. It has been cost cutting & working on different pipeline routes to ports other than Kitimat but larger diameter pipes. It is planning to change the final design of the terminal completely. It will no longer be a land terminal but will be a floating storage terminal in Kitimat area waters or other potentially more cost effective waterways in west coast of BC. It is keeping this information confidential in order to receive government approval. Enbridge is hoping it can go ahead with a totally revised plan using existing conditions & approval processes which were in place for the original lower risk project. Deceiving its customers, the public and the government is normal practice at Enbridge. This is a fact: As the government makes a decision to approve the project, Enbridge plans to change it all together while misleading everyone knowingly for months.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: