Kinder Morgan quietly cleans up contaminated soil near Coquihalla Canyon

Activist pulls back curtain to show Kinder Morgan pipeline flaws and Kinder Morgan questions his credentials

Tree root and oil leaked from KM Trans Canada pipeline near Hope, BC.

Tree root and oil leaked from KM Trans Canada pipeline near Hope, BC.

Jenny Uechi, Vancouver Observer, Nov 8th, 2013
Kinder Morgan has quietly been removing some 5005 cubic metres of oil-contaminated soil from its Trans Mountain pipeline near Coquihalla Canyon, near Hope since June 28, according to the National Energy Board (NEB). “I think there’s been more oil spilled than they’re saying,” Vancouver-based pipeline critic David Ellis said, about the reported 25-barrel figure.
And while a Kinder Morgan representative told the Vancouver Observer there were “no Kinder Morgan-branded trucks” moving any contaminated soil, NEB spokesperson Rebecca Taylor confirmed that soil was indeed being removed, a good part of it “definitely directly contaminated”. Oil-soaked soil biodegrades over time, but can harm vegetation at its roots and can be toxic to animals if ingested.
Ellis has photographed places where the pipeline was exposed and corroded and signs indicating where pipeline anomalies may be. A bookseller specializing in Western First Nations literature and a former fisheries planner, Ellis raised an alarm when he saw trucks moving soil to Tervita Corporation in Richmond, which specializes in disposal of industrial waste.

Questioning credentials and demanding answers

Ellis treks out on weekends to pipeline excavation sites (where security has received orders not to let him pass) and frequently sends the NEB inquiries accompanied by photos about the pipeline’s condition. By his estimation, there are 35 recent urgent repair sites along the pipeline where the company performed hydrostatic testing in October. The Texas-based company’s plans to twin the aging pipeline and expand capacity from 300,000 to 890,000 barrels of oil per day, in his view, could place British Columbians at risk for a big spill, Ellis told the Vancouver Observer.
Given that Coquihalla Canyon is a provincial park area teeming with wildlife (and only 40 kilometres from Hope), people should be relieved that Kinder Morgan has been removing the soil and replacing it.

Close up of KM's Trans Mountain pipeline near Coquihalla Canyon.

Close up of KM’s Trans Mountain pipeline near Coquihalla Canyon.

Except that four months and 600 truckloads later, the company is still taking out soil, and that leads him to believe something isn’t right. Kinder Morgan spokesperson Andy Galarnyk insisted that “the large volume of soil removed (from Coquihalla Canyon) was not considered hazardous waste, but was removed to meet strict clean up criteria because of its location within a provincial park.” The NEB agreed that its cleanup standards mean removal of soil until it is tested to be completely safe. Galarnyk added that Ellis “does does not have any experience or qualifications to comment on pipeline operations”.
But the bookseller, who has a Masters in Science from UBC and extensively documents the pipeline around the Coquihalla and Kamloops, has raised questions that are getting harder to dismiss.

As safe as it was 60 years ago?

Ellis, a plain-spoken man who readily admits he’s no expert, came to prominence after he accurately predicted a Kinder Morgan pipeline spill along the Trans Mountain pipeline near Merritt and Hope one year before it happened. On a pipeline more than 1,000 kilometres long, he had said when and where the it would leak. “It was where high corrosion meets high pressure due to a sudden altitude drop,” he said.

The Globe and Mail wrote in September that Ellis’ “plodding, unrelenting opposition” to the pipeline has started to get noticed, and he’s been an on-the-ground source for photos and documentation of Trans Mountain pipeline’s aging condition.

While Kinder Morgan CEO Ian Anderson said at a Vancouver Board of Trade event on Tuesday that the pipeline is “just as safe and secure as it was 60 years ago, even more so”, Ellis isn’t sure it was very secure to begin with.

What he’s found in a rare 1954 book, The Building of Trans Mountain: Canada’s first oil pipeline across the Rockies, suggests that the pipeline was made in 1952 with construction methods and materials that would not be acceptable today. There are passages documenting thinner walls along the pipeline to save costs near Hope, where the leak occurred in June. Pipeline walls, it says, were made thinner in the last 12 miles around Hope.

What’s more, he says, the old pipeline doesn’t appear to have been very well maintained over the years.

“There’s poor maintenance. There are even some areas where tree roots are digging into the Trans Mountain pipe, already weak after 61 years,” Ellis said. Tree roots can damage the protective coating around a pipeline and come in direct contact with the steel pipe, causing faster corrosion.

He also wonders about the concentration of lollipop-like metal signs, which appear to be a marker where the pipeline is in need of reinforcements. The signs are marked “PS” indicating “petrosleeve”, where a pipeline has been reinforced.

“I’m just using my common sense,” he said, noting a high concentration of these signs may indicate more anomalies found along the pipe.

What’s going on at Portia Gate? 

These days, Ellis has been especially concerned about the repairs happening Portia Gate, which he said one security guard described as being the biggest of 30 repair sites along the pipeline. The area is ecologically sensitive because it’s near the Coquihalla River, which flows into the Fraser River, home to huge returns of pink salmon this year.

He’s been trying to find out more, but security guards now have a file on Ellis and escort him out whenever they see him. Asked about situation around Portia Gate, Galarnyk wouldn’t respond directly, but said, “We monitor and work with all government and regulatory agencies who have jurisdiction  to ensure that we are meeting any and all requirements for remediation and site restoration anywhere we are conducting work.” And aside from a few major spills like the one in Burnaby in 2007, Kinder Morgan has had a reliable safety record, with only 78 incidents over the last six decades.

But the heavy security in the area makes Ellis wonder what the company is trying so hard to keep out of public view.

“Just what are they hiding at Portia Gate?” he asked. If there is a leak near that area, both the Coquihalla and Fraser rivers could be threatened.

All the NEB would say in response is that Kinder Morgan is excavating the pipeline to look for potential defects that could lead to a leak.

http://www.vancouverobserver.com/environment/activist-pulls-back-curtain-show-kinder-morgan-pipeline-flaws-and-kinder-morgan

Posted on November 8, 2013, in Oil & Gas and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started