Kinder Morgan quietly cleans up contaminated soil near Coquihalla Canyon
Activist pulls back curtain to show Kinder Morgan pipeline flaws and Kinder Morgan questions his credentials
Questioning credentials and demanding answers
As safe as it was 60 years ago?
Ellis, a plain-spoken man who readily admits he’s no expert, came to prominence after he accurately predicted a Kinder Morgan pipeline spill along the Trans Mountain pipeline near Merritt and Hope one year before it happened. On a pipeline more than 1,000 kilometres long, he had said when and where the it would leak. “It was where high corrosion meets high pressure due to a sudden altitude drop,” he said.
The Globe and Mail wrote in September that Ellis’ “plodding, unrelenting opposition” to the pipeline has started to get noticed, and he’s been an on-the-ground source for photos and documentation of Trans Mountain pipeline’s aging condition.
While Kinder Morgan CEO Ian Anderson said at a Vancouver Board of Trade event on Tuesday that the pipeline is “just as safe and secure as it was 60 years ago, even more so”, Ellis isn’t sure it was very secure to begin with.
What he’s found in a rare 1954 book, The Building of Trans Mountain: Canada’s first oil pipeline across the Rockies, suggests that the pipeline was made in 1952 with construction methods and materials that would not be acceptable today. There are passages documenting thinner walls along the pipeline to save costs near Hope, where the leak occurred in June. Pipeline walls, it says, were made thinner in the last 12 miles around Hope.
What’s more, he says, the old pipeline doesn’t appear to have been very well maintained over the years.
“There’s poor maintenance. There are even some areas where tree roots are digging into the Trans Mountain pipe, already weak after 61 years,” Ellis said. Tree roots can damage the protective coating around a pipeline and come in direct contact with the steel pipe, causing faster corrosion.
He also wonders about the concentration of lollipop-like metal signs, which appear to be a marker where the pipeline is in need of reinforcements. The signs are marked “PS” indicating “petrosleeve”, where a pipeline has been reinforced.
“I’m just using my common sense,” he said, noting a high concentration of these signs may indicate more anomalies found along the pipe.
What’s going on at Portia Gate?
These days, Ellis has been especially concerned about the repairs happening Portia Gate, which he said one security guard described as being the biggest of 30 repair sites along the pipeline. The area is ecologically sensitive because it’s near the Coquihalla River, which flows into the Fraser River, home to huge returns of pink salmon this year.
He’s been trying to find out more, but security guards now have a file on Ellis and escort him out whenever they see him. Asked about situation around Portia Gate, Galarnyk wouldn’t respond directly, but said, “We monitor and work with all government and regulatory agencies who have jurisdiction to ensure that we are meeting any and all requirements for remediation and site restoration anywhere we are conducting work.” And aside from a few major spills like the one in Burnaby in 2007, Kinder Morgan has had a reliable safety record, with only 78 incidents over the last six decades.
But the heavy security in the area makes Ellis wonder what the company is trying so hard to keep out of public view.
“Just what are they hiding at Portia Gate?” he asked. If there is a leak near that area, both the Coquihalla and Fraser rivers could be threatened.
All the NEB would say in response is that Kinder Morgan is excavating the pipeline to look for potential defects that could lead to a leak.
Posted on November 8, 2013, in Oil & Gas and tagged Kinder Morgan, Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain pipeline, pipeline leaks, Tar Sands, Trans Mountain pipeline. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.



Reblogged this on Free UniversE-ity.
Pingback: Kinder Morgan quietly cleans up contaminated soil near Coquihalla Canyon | In Frog Pond Holler