Drilling at proposed LNG terminal starts despite First Nation opposition

Drilling ship at work off Lelu Island, Sept 15, 2015.

Drilling ship at work off Lelu Island, Sept 15, 2015.

Prince Rupert Port Authority orders protesters to stay 50 metres away from marine work

By Gordon Hoekstra, Vancouver Sun, September 15, 2015
Petronas-led Pacific NorthWest LNG has started test drilling off of Lelu Island, location of its proposed $11.4-billion liquefied natural gas terminal in northwest B.C., despite First Nation opposition.

Members of several First Nations — including the Lax Kw’alaams and the Gitxsan — appeared to stop drilling on the weekend, but the presence of Prince Rupert Port Authority boats has allowed the work to start, Lax Kw’alaams First Nation hereditary chief Don Wesley, also known as Sm’oogyet Yahaan, said Tuesday.

Port authority personnel told him to stay at least 50 metres away from a drilling rig when he approached with his boat, said Wesley, a hereditary chief of the Gitwilgyoots, one of the nine tribes of the Lower Skeena River region.

“They are thinking that nobody is watching,” he said, referring to the work now underway.

Wesley said he is seeking legal advice to determine whether he should adhere to the 50-metre warning.

Wesley is leading a three-week-old occupation camp on Lelu Island in an effort to halt the project over concerns it will harm salmon-rearing eel grass beds on Flora Bank adjacent to the island.

The terminal and a pipeline have been approved by the province, but a federal review has been held up over concerns about a bridge and peer that skirt one edge of Flora Bank.

Wesley said he is particularly concerned the company was carrying work out on Flora Bank, including drilling and extracting eel grass.

Pacific NorthWest LNG said Tuesday it is doing neither, and that its drilling work is taking place away from Flora Bank.

Pacific NorthWest spokesman Spencer Sproule said engineering consultants Stantec are carrying out eel grass surveys on Flora Bank to determine its density, length and species but are not removing any grass.

The drilling work is the third phase of engineering work to gather data on soils in the marine environment, said Sproule.

He said the soil investigation is being conducted with the participation of First Nation monitors, but could not say from which First Nations.

This spring, Lax Kw’alaams members rejected a $1.15-billion benefits package from the company and province over concerns about Flora Bank. After the benefits rejection, the First Nation said is was not opposed to LNG development, but Flora Bank was off limits.

The First Nation issued a message last month to its members that alternative sites were being explored, but company president Michael Culbert told a LNG conference they were exploring modifications to the site, not an alternative location.

Pacific NorthWest LNG officials have declined to say if the drilling work underway is to examine another location for the bridge and peer.

An AltaCorp Capital report on leading LNG projects in B.C. released Monday — following the conference that included Culbert — concluded a major redesign is not possible because it would result in a delay of several years.

Instead, AltaCorp said they believed more likely is that the bridge and pier would be relocated farther from Flora Bank.

The Prince Rupert Port Authority said Tuesday it is monitoring the boats near the drilling work.

“Should a situation ever arise where the Port Authority encounters refusals to cease dangerous actions within the harbour, the situation could be referred to RCMP for consideration and involvement if appropriate,” port spokesman Michael Gurney said in an email.



Posted on September 15, 2015, in Oil & Gas and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.

  1. cynthiajoanmorrison


  2. Reblogged this on Dolphin and commented:
    You know, if another country like Iran or Iraq were to come here and do to Canada or the United States what the energy companies are doing to the First Nations/Native Americans, there would be war!

  3. Why are they just allowed to go into territories and destroy environment? There needs to be equal treatment. They are in First Nations Territory! Did they get permission? Why are there no charges being made to those people from trespassing? This makes no sense!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: