Supreme Court ruling removes barrier for developing year-round ski resort on sacred First Nation land


A landmark 7-2 decision released Thursday by Canada’s top court paves the way for development of the Jumbo Glacier resort in the Kootenays region of British Columbia, despite strong objections from the Ktunaxa Nation. (Jumbo Glacier Resort)

Proposed project in B.C. pits Indigenous religious rights against public interest in Crown land

By Kathleen Harris, CBC News, Nov 2, 2017

Building a massive ski resort on B.C. land considered sacred to a First Nation does not breach religious rights, the Supreme Court of Canada says in a decision released Thursday.

The landmark 7-2 decision paves the way for development of the Jumbo Glacier resort in the Kootenays region of British Columbia, despite strong objections from the Ktunaxa Nation.

The Ktunaxa believe the project will drive Grizzly Bear Spirit from Qat’mak, the traditional name for the spiritual territory, and permanently impair their religious beliefs and spiritual practices.

Interpreting scope of religious protections

Interpreting the scope of religious protections under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Supreme Court said those protections include freedom to hold such beliefs and manifest those beliefs, but do not extend to the protection of sacred sites.

“We arrive at these conclusions cognizant of the importance of protecting Indigenous religious beliefs and practices, and the place of such protection in achieving reconciliation between Indigenous peoples and non-Indigenous communities,” reads the judgment written by Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin and Justice Malcolm Rowe.

Two other justices, Michael Moldaver and Suzanne Côté, took a broader view of the Charter religious protections, but still agreed with the majority in rejecting the Ktunaxa appeal on grounds of public interest.

No veto power

The ruling said the B.C. government had engaged in “deep consultation” throughout the process, and had met its duty to consult and accommodate under Sec. 35 of the Constitution Act. The section does not give Indigenous groups a veto power over development projects; it guarantees a process, but not a particular result, the ruling said.

“Where adequate consultation has occurred, a development may proceed without consent,” it reads.

Despite the court ruling, the project still has to clear environmental and other regulatory hurdles in order to proceed.

Tommaso Oberti, vice-president of the Pheidias Group which is managing the project, said there is “absolutely” a plan to move on the project, though it has been on hold pending the legal challenge. Investors and the board of directors must meet to chart a path forward, but said the project is definitely not dead.

‘Tremendous value’

“The group obviously has been pretty persistent and the project has tremendous value,” he told CBC News.

“They wouldn’t have spent all this money on the project. They would have walked away before spending all the money on lawyers. That’s not the case.”

Assembly of First Nations National Chief Perry Bellegarde said the decision reflects a need for judges and legislators to more deeply understand traditions of First Nations people, who see ceremonies as inextricably linked to the land and water.

“It’s a bit of a lack of awareness and understanding through the Supreme Court about that world view,” he said.

Year-round ski resort

The project, which would be a year-round resort by Glacier Resort, has been tied up in legal wrangling since the plan’s inception in 1991.

According to its website, the project would be a “unique sightseeing destination” and a big economic generator for construction jobs and resort employment. It would provide lifts to four glaciers at an elevation of up to 3,419 metres.

The three-phase project would include 5,500 bed-units plus 750 beds for staff accommodations, and is expected to draw 2,000 to 3,000 visitors a day in high season.

The resort’s location was chosen for its optimal snow conditions, high elevations, large glaciers and the fact the Jumbo Creek valley has seen “significant prior use,” the website reads.

Posted on November 2, 2017, in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Leave a comment.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: